Intimate Partner Violence

Full Review: Aug 2026 ByErin G. Clifton, PhD, University of Michigan | Eve D Losman, MD, MHSA, University of Michigan School of Medicine | Peer reviewed byOluwatosin Goje, MD, MSCR, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
Last updated: Aug 2026
v12764731
View Patient Education

Intimate partner violence (IPV) includes physical, sexual, and emotional or psychological abuse between people who live together, including current or former sex partners or spouses.

Intimate partner violence is a common problem. In the United States from 2003 to 2012, domestic violence comprised 21% of all violent crime, with 15% of violent crime being intimate partner violence (1). Globally, on average, a woman or girl is killed by someone in her own family every 11 minutes; 47,000 women and girls were killed by an intimate partner or a family member in 2020 (2).

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey found that, in their lifetime, more than 34% of women and more than 17% of men experience stalking, physical violence, and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner; women are more likely to experience severe physical violence or contact sexual violence (3). Intimate partner violence occurs among people of all ages, races, and ethnicities. Intimate partner violence is as prevalent among lesbian and bisexual women, gay and bisexual men, and transgender people as among the general population (4, 5). Women are more likely to be killed by an intimate partner than are men; in 2021, 34% of female murder and manslaughter victims were killed by an intimate partner versus 6% of male victims (6). The risk is especially high if the perpetrator has access to a gun (7).

Pregnancy and the postpartum period are particularly vulnerable periods. Studies report a wide range of any type of intimate partner violence during pregnancy (approximately 6 to 60%) (8, 9). Approximately 17% of women report intimate partner violence in the first year postpartum (10).

During the COVID-19 pandemic, intimate partner violence became more prevalent in many countries. Reasons probably include stress due to loss of income and loss of contact with other people. Also, people who were abused often could not escape to a shelter or another safe place (11, 12).

Terminology regarding people who have experienced intimate partner violence varies. The term “victim” is a term used by the criminal justice system and is also often used for someone who is currently or has recently experienced violence. The term "survivor" is often used to refer to someone who has gone through a recovery. Clinicians should ask patients about terms they prefer (see RAINN [Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network]: What “Counts” as Sexual Violence? and Women Against Abuse: The Language We Use).

(See also Child Maltreatment and Elder Abuse.)

General references

  1. 1. Truman JL, Morgan RE, BJS statisticians: Nonfatal domestic violence, 2003-2012. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Accessed May 21, 2026.

  2. 2. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDOC): Killings of women and girls by their intimate partner or other family members. Global estimated 2020. Data 3 matters [Internet] 2021. Accessed May 21, 2026.

  3. 3. Kudon HZ, Zhu S, Chen B, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2023/2024 Report on Intimate Partner Violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2026. Accessed May 21, 2026.

  4. 4. Brown TNT, Herman JL. Intimate partner violence and sexual abuse among LGBT people: A review of existing research. Williams Institute, 2015. Accessed May 21, 2026.

  5. 5. Trujillo-Guablocho J, Mosquera Minaya C, Centeno-Terrazas G. (2025). Intimate partner violence in lesbian, gay, transgender, men who have sex with men, women who have sex with women, and bisexual people: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. Interacciones. 2025;11, e459. https://doi.org/10.24016/2025.v11.459

  6. 6. Smith EL, FBI Bureau of Justice Statistics. Female Murder Victims and Victim-Offender Relationship, 2021. Published December 2022. Accessed May 21, 2026.

  7. 7. Campbell JC, Webster D, Koziol-McLain J, et al. Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a multisite case control study. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(7):1089-1097, 2003. doi:10.2105/ajph.93.7.1089

  8. 8. Chen XY, Lo CKM, Chen Q, et al. Intimate Partner Violence Against Women Before, During, and After Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024;25(4):2768-2780. doi:10.1177/15248380241226631

  9. 9. Jahanfar S, Howard LM, Medley N. Interventions for preventing or reducing domestic violence against pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(11):CD009414. Published 2014 Nov 12. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009414.pub3

  10. 10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 8: Interpregnancy Care. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):e51-e72. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003025

  11. 11. Noman AHM, Griffiths MD, Pervin S, et al. The detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on domestic violence against women. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;134:111–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.057

  12. 12. Irvin-Erickson Y, Natarajan M, Smith L, et al. Covid-19 pandemic, domestic violence, and victims’ access to services: Findings from a survey of victim service providers in the US. Crime Science. 2025;14(1). doi:10.1186/s40163-025-00253-x 

Types of Intimate Partner Violence

Physical abuse is the most obvious form of intimate partner violence. It may include hitting, slapping, kicking, punching, breaking bones, pulling hair, pushing, twisting arms, or throwing objects at the victim. The victim may be deprived of food, sleep, or medical care. Weapons, such as a gun or knife, may be used to threaten or cause injury.

Sexual abuse or coercion is also common; many women who are physically assaulted by their partner are also sexually assaulted by their partner. Sexual assault is any type of sexual activity or contact that a person does not consent to. Sexual assault involves the use of threats or force to coerce sexual contact and includes unwanted touching, grabbing, kissing, or penetrative sexual contact. Sexual coercion can range from begging and persuasion or making someone feel obligated to engage in sexual contact to forced sexual contact (1).

Reproductive coercion is a form of power and control where one partner strips another of the ability to control their own reproductive system (1). It may appear as pressure, guilt, or shame about having or wanting children (or not having or wanting them).

Emotional or psychological abuse may be even more common than physical abuse and may precede it or occur at the same time. Emotional or psychological abuse involves any nonphysical behavior that undermines or belittles the victim or that enables the perpetrator to control the victim. Emotional or psychological abuse can include:

  • Abusive language

  • Social isolation

  • Financial control

  • Technology-facilitated abuse

Frequently, perpetrators use language to demean, degrade, humiliate, intimidate, or threaten victims in private or in public. Perpetrators may emotionally or psychologically abuse victims so that victims start to question their own feelings, instincts, and sanity (gaslighting) and may make victims feel guilty or responsible for the abusive relationship.

The perpetrator may try to partly or completely isolate the victim by controlling the victim’s access to friends, relatives, and other people. Control may include forbidding direct, written, telephone, or e-mail contact with others. The perpetrator may manipulate the victim into thinking that others cannot or will not help, or use jealousy to justify these actions. The perpetrator may also prevent the victim from accessing medical care.

Often, the perpetrator withholds money to control the victim. The victim may depend on the perpetrator for most or all of their money. The perpetrator may maintain control by preventing the victim from getting a job, by withholding information about their finances, and by taking money.

Technology-facilitated abuse (online abuse) is the use of technology to communicate with a partner in a way that is emotionally or psychologically abusive or using images created. delivered, or shared using technology to bully, harass, humiliate, or intimidate a partner (1).

After an incident of abuse, the perpetrator may beg for forgiveness and promise to change and stop the abusive behavior. However, typically, the abuse continues and often escalates.

The perpetrator's outbursts of violence tend to be episodic and unpredictable. Thus, victims may live in near-constant fear of the next outburst.

Stalking is a pattern of repeated, unwanted attention and contact by a partner that causes fear or concern for one’s own safety or the safety of someone close to the victim. Stalking can include:

  • Unwanted phone calls, emails, messages through social media, mail, or presents (eg, flowers)

  • Watching, spying on, or following the victim from a distance

  • Intruding into the victim's home, workplace, or school

Perpetrators may use technology (eg, social media web sites, phones) to post videos or monitor or stalk the victim (2, 3). Also, perpetrators may monitor the victim's devices, often without the victim knowing it.

Types references

  1. 1. National Domestic Violence Hotline. Types of Abuse. Accessed May 21, 2026.

  2. 2. Woodlock D. The abuse of technology in Intimate partner violence and stalking. Violence Against Women. 2017;23(5):584–602. doi: 10.1177/1077801216646277

  3. 3. Henry N, Powell A. Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2018;19(2), 195–208. doi: 10.1177/1524838016650189

Effects of Intimate Partner Violence

Survivors of all types of intimate partner violence are at high risk of developing mental health issues, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), substance use disorders, anxiety, depression (1, 2), self-harm, and suicide. Even when physical abuse decreases, emotional or psychological abuse often continues, reminding victims that they can be physically abused at any time.

Injuries may negatively affect the victim's ability to work, possibly leading to loss of income. Injuries, as well as the abusive situation, may embarrass victims, or perpetrators may attempt to avoid detection by preventing a victim with a visible physical injury from going to work or social gatherings, causing victims to isolate from family and friends. To escape the perpetrator, victims may move or change jobs often or suddenly, which can be a financial or social burden or a disruption in the education of victims or their children.

Intimate partner violence may be fatal and may result in short-term musculoskeletal injuries or persistent disability. Physical injuries can include bruises, black eyes, cuts, scratches, broken bones, lost teeth, burns, and lacerations or other injuries to genitals. Injuries may not heal properly if victims do not receive appropriate medical care because of embarrassment or being prevented from receiving health care by the perpetrator.

Victims of intimate partner violence also have increased rates of reproductive and sexual health impacts, including sexually transmitted infections, menstrual disorders, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, menopausal symptoms, and preterm birth (3).

Current or past intimate partner violence is associated with increased risk of developing severe or chronic disease, including cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and respiratory disease (4, 5).

One study found that 11% of children in the United States are exposed to some form of family violence in a year and 26% are exposed to at least one form of family violence during their lifetimes (1). These children may develop problems including (2):

  • Excessive anxiety or crying

  • Fearfulness

  • Difficulty sleeping

  • Difficulty concentrating

  • Depression and/or anxiety

  • Social withdrawal

  • Difficulty in school (eg, truancy, poor grades, aggressive behaviors towards peers for children who view violence as a legitimate form of problem solving)

Also, children may blame themselves for the situation.

Older children may run away from home.

The perpetrator may also physically hurt the children. In homes where intimate partner violence is present, children are much more likely to be physically mistreated.

1. Hamby S, Finkelhor D, Turner H: Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence and other forms of family violence: Nationally representative rates among US youth. OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin - NCJ 232272, 1-12, 2011. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office

2. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Domestic Violence and Children No. 109; Updated September 2023. Accessed May 26, 2026.

1. Hamby S, Finkelhor D, Turner H: Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence and other forms of family violence: Nationally representative rates among US youth. OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin - NCJ 232272, 1-12, 2011. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office

2. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Domestic Violence and Children No. 109; Updated September 2023. Accessed May 26, 2026.

Effects references

  1. 1. Oram S, Khalifeh H, Howard LM. Violence against women and mental health. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(2):159-170. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30261-9

  2. 2. Alejo K. Long-term physical and mental health effects of domestic violence. Themis. 2014;2(1). doi:10.31979/themis.2014.0205 

  3. 3. Miller E, McCaw B. Intimate Partner Violence. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(9):850-857. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1807166

  4. 4. Coker AL, Davis KE, Arias I, et al. Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. Am J Prev Med. 23(4):260-268, 2002. doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00514-7

  5. 5. Jones BW, Rossi SL, Goralski JL, et al. Associations between IPV and non-communicable diseases: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):3216. Published 2025 Sep 30. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-24498-y

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence

Many expert organizations recommend routine screening of all patients or those at highest risk at least at the following points in health care (1, 2, 3):

  • Initiation of health care with a new primary care or obstetrics and gynecology clinician

  • During pregnancy at the first prenatal visit, at least once per trimester, and during the postpartum visit

  • During an emergency department visit

  • Upon hospital admission

Victims of intimate partner violence often present to emergency departments with physical injuries or other complaints. In one study of 964 victims of intimate partner violence in a police database, 64% had received care at an emergency department within one year prior to the index assault (4).

Routine screening for intimate partner violence or evaluation of a patient in whom such violence is suspected is crucial to protect victims from further harm.

Several key principles of screening include:

  • Ensuring privacy and confidentiality: Screen patients when they are alone. The partner and any other accompanying people can be asked to step away; children should also step away and be in the care of another parent or caregiver. Use a professional medical interpreter if necessary. Assure the patient that anything they say will be kept confidential.

  • Frame the conversation: Starting with a framing question can make the patient feel more comfortable and ease feelings of embarrassment. An example is: "We talk to all of our patients about safe and healthy relationships because it can have such a large impact on health," or "Because violence is so common in many people’s lives, I ask all my patients about their relationships."

  • Ask a single question, such as "Has your current partner ever threatened you or made you feel afraid?" or use a validated screening tool with several questions.*

  • Ask directly and use a neutral and nonjudgmental tone of voice.

  • Provide validation and empathy.

  • If the patient reports abuse, assess safety and make an appropriate plan to ensure immediate and subsequent safety.

  • Provide resources that address medical, emotional or psychological, and financial components of the intimate partner violence and contributing factors.

  • Document carefully; consider that partners may have access to the patient's medical record through a patient online portal.

The perpetrator may also physically hurt the children. In homes where intimate partner violence is present, children are much more likely to be physically mistreated.

Laws about reporting intimate partner violence vary by state and sometimes by type of clinician (see MandatedReporter.com).

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 518: Intimate partner violence. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2 Pt 1):412-417. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318249ff74

US Preventive Services Task Force, Silverstein M, Wong JB, et al. Screening for Intimate Partner Violence and Caregiver Abuse of Older or Vulnerable Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2025;334(4):329-338. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.9009

* There are several validated screening tools for intimate partner violence, including: Iverson KM, King MW, Resick PA, et al. Clinical utility of an intimate partner violence screening tool for female VHA patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(10):1288-1293. doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2534-x; Sohal H, Eldridge S, Feder G. The sensitivity and specificity of four questions (HARK) to identify intimate partner violence: a diagnostic accuracy study in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:49. Published 2007 Aug 29. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-8-49; Wathen CN, Jamieson E, MacMillan HL; McMaster Violence Against Women Research Group. Who is identified by screening for intimate partner violence?. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18(6):423-432. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2008.08.003

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 518: Intimate partner violence. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2 Pt 1):412-417. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318249ff74

US Preventive Services Task Force, Silverstein M, Wong JB, et al. Screening for Intimate Partner Violence and Caregiver Abuse of Older or Vulnerable Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2025;334(4):329-338. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.9009

* There are several validated screening tools for intimate partner violence, including: Iverson KM, King MW, Resick PA, et al. Clinical utility of an intimate partner violence screening tool for female VHA patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(10):1288-1293. doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2534-x; Sohal H, Eldridge S, Feder G. The sensitivity and specificity of four questions (HARK) to identify intimate partner violence: a diagnostic accuracy study in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:49. Published 2007 Aug 29. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-8-49; Wathen CN, Jamieson E, MacMillan HL; McMaster Violence Against Women Research Group. Who is identified by screening for intimate partner violence?. Womens Health Issues. 2008;18(6):423-432. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2008.08.003

Screening references

  1. 1. US Preventive Services Task Force, Silverstein M, Wong JB, et al. Screening for Intimate Partner Violence and Caregiver Abuse of Older or Vulnerable Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2025;334(4):329-338. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.9009

  2. 2. Phares TM, Sherin K, Harrison SL, et al. Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Intervention: The American College of Preventive Medicine Position Statement. Am J Prev Med. 2019;57(6):862-872. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.003

  3. 3. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 518: Intimate partner violence. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2 Pt 1):412-417. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318249ff74

  4. 4. Kothari CL, Rhodes KV. Missed opportunities: emergency department visits by police-identified victims of intimate partner violence. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47(2):190-199. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.10.016

Evaluation of Intimate Partner Violence

  • History and physical examination

  • Screening questionnaires

  • Sometimes imaging studies

Clinicians may suspect intimate partner violence based on injuries, inconsistent or puzzling symptoms, and/or behavior of the victim and/or partner (eg, a partner is reluctant to leave the victim alone with the clinician). Or, a victim may report the abuse.

Victims of intimate partner violence present with injuries that may have patterns of anatomic distribution that can guide clinical recognition. The face, particularly the midface (nasal bones, orbits, mandible), is the most frequent site of injury (1). Injuries may also occur to the head, neck (including strangulation), thorax (rib, sternum, and clavicular fractures are common), and injury to abdominal organs. Injuries to the extremities are also common, with fractures of the fingers, hand, and forearm considered to be typical of defensive injuries (injuries occurring when victims raise their hand to protect themselves).

Known or suspected physical trauma is evaluated. Sexual assault, if suspected, is also appropriately evaluated. Patients who screen positive for intimate partner violence should also be screened for mental health conditions, because their risk is increased.

If clinicians suspect intimate partner violence, they should use the same approach as in routine screening.

Clinicians should also try to determine whether the victim can safely return home before leaving the health care facility. Safety is in doubt in the following circumstances:

  • The victim has threatened to leave the relationship (most common precipitant for homicide) (2, 3).

  • Violence has been increasing in risk of injury or death (eg, assaults escalate to involve choking).

  • The partner has access to weapons.

  • The partner has threatened to kill or injure the victim.

If intimate partner violence is suspected, clinicians should provide information about resources to help. If intimate partner violence is confirmed, clinicians may be required to document the evidence of abuse, often by photographing the injuries. This documentation can be used to support a legal case against the perpetrator. Laws about reporting intimate partner violence vary by state and sometimes by type of clinician (see MandatedReporter.com).

Evaluation references

  1. 1. Tang A, Wong A, Khurana B. Imaging of Intimate Partner Violence, From the AJR Special Series on Emergency Radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023;220(4):476-485. doi:10.2214/AJR.22.27973

  2. 2. Auchter, B. Men who murder their families: what the research tells us. NIJ Journal, No. 266 (June 2010), pp. 10–12

  3. 3. Nicolaidis C, Curry MA, Ulrich Y, et al. Could we have known? A qualitative analysis of data from women who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(10):788-794. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21202.x

Management of Intimate Partner Violence

If intimate partner violence is known or suspected, the first priority is to treat acute injuries and ensure the patient's safety.

Physical injuries are treated. If there has been exposure to sexually transmitted infections or a risk of unintended pregnancy, measures to prevent these are offered. Mental health counseling is provided, if appropriate.

Clinicians should connect the patient with health care professionals and organizations to provide immediate and subsequent help to ensure physical and emotional or psychological safety. Multicomponent interventions for intimate partner violence combine aspects that specifically address the violence with those that support the patient with contextual factors, including health, family, or social needs (1). 

Patients may need help with developing a safety plan. Clinicians may collaborate in this but should respect patients' autonomy and let the them take the lead. It should include how the patient (and children, if they are also at risk) can get away from the perpetrator if needed, where to go for help, and how to access money and other types of support (eg, housing).

Sometimes the only solution is to leave the abusive relationship permanently because intimate partner violence continues, especially among very aggressive perpetrators. Also, even when physical abuse decreases, emotional or psychological abuse may persist. The decision to leave is not simple or easy. Victims often feel unable to leave an abusive relationship for multiple reasons, including fear of retaliation and economic dependence on the abuser.

After the perpetrator knows the victim has decided to leave, the victim’s risk of serious harm and death may be greatest. At this time, victims should take additional steps to protect themselves and their children—for example, by obtaining a restraining or protection order (although such an order does not guarantee safety).

In the United States, help is available through shelters for intimate partner violence survivors (including those in LGBTQ+ communities), support groups, the courts, and a national hotline (1-800-799-SAFE or, for TTY, 1-800-787-3224). The National Domestic Violence Helpline also has chat options if the victim is unable to make a voice call.

Management reference

  1. 1. US Preventive Services Task Force, Silverstein M, Wong JB, et al. Screening for Intimate Partner Violence and Caregiver Abuse of Older or Vulnerable Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2025;334(4):329-338. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.9009

Key Points

  • Intimate partner violence includes physical, sexual, and emotional or psychological abuse between people who live together, including sex partners and spouses.

  • Physical injuries, emotional or psychological issues, social isolation, loss of a job, financial difficulties, and even death can result.

  • Keeping safe—for example, having a plan of escape—is the most important consideration.

  • Because Intimate partner violence tends to continue, sometimes the only solution is to leave the abusive relationship permanently, which requires preparation and extra precautions to ensure safety.

quizzes_lightbulb_red
Test your KnowledgeTake a Quiz!
IOS ANDROID
IOS ANDROID
iOS ANDROID